SR‑115 Rig Based Multi‑Strata Bearing Capacity Calculator
| Rig Input Parameters | |
|---|---|
| Depth (m) | |
| Torque (kNm) | |
| Crowd Force (kN) | |
| RPM | |
| Penetration Rate (mm/min) | |
| Strata Selection | |
| Soil / Rock Type | |
| Design Parameters | |
| Calibration Factor (k) | |
| Factor of Safety | |
• DRI derived from torque, crowd & penetration.
• DRI correlated to SPT‑N (field calibration required).
• Empirical bearing capacity correlations from geotechnical practice.
• Final design must be verified by borehole & load test.
SR-115 Rig-Based Multi-Strata Bearing Capacity Calculator
Theoretical Background and Engineering Methodology
This tool provides a quick empirical estimation of allowable and ultimate bearing capacity using real-time drilling parameters from rotary rigs (such as SR-115). It converts rig performance data into an equivalent Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-value and then applies soil/rock-type-specific correlations to estimate bearing capacity.
1. Introduction
In modern geotechnical practice, Measurement While Drilling (MWD) or rig parameter monitoring offers a continuous, cost-effective way to assess subsurface conditions. By recording torque, crowd (thrust) force, penetration rate, and RPM during drilling, engineers can derive indices that reflect the resistance of the ground — helping to identify strata changes and estimate strength parameters without relying solely on traditional SPT or CPT tests.
2. Drilling Resistance Index (DRI)
The calculator starts by computing a simple **Drilling Resistance Index (DRI)**:
DRI = (Crowd Force × Torque) / Penetration Rate
where:
- Crowd Force (kN) — downward thrust applied by the rig
- Torque (kNm) — rotational resistance
- Penetration Rate (mm/min) — rate of drill bit advance
Higher DRI values indicate greater ground resistance (harder material).
3. Correlation to Equivalent SPT N-Value
The DRI is then mapped to an equivalent SPT N-value using a stepwise empirical relationship (calibrated with a user-defined factor k):
| DRI Range | Base N-Value |
|---|---|
| < 50 | 3 |
| 50 – 150 | 10 |
| 150 – 300 | 22 |
| 300 – 600 | 40 |
| > 600 | 60 |
Final N = Base N × Calibration Factor (k)
Note: This is a simplified empirical correlation. In practice, site-specific calibration against actual SPT values is strongly recommended for reliable results.
4. Bearing Capacity Estimation by Soil/Rock Type
Once the equivalent N-value is obtained, the tool applies type-specific empirical correlations commonly used in preliminary geotechnical assessments:
| Soil/Rock Type | Correlation Used | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Cohesionless Sand | qa ≈ 10N (kPa) | Classic Terzaghi-type correlation for sand |
| Cohesive Clay | Cu ≈ 5N (kPa) qult ≈ 5.7 × Cu | Undrained shear strength and Skempton’s bearing capacity factor |
| Silty Sand / Sand with fines | qa ≈ 9N | Slightly reduced due to fines content |
| Gravel / Sandy Gravel | qa ≈ 16N | Higher due to better interlocking |
| Silt | Cu ≈ 4N qult ≈ 5 × Cu | Lower strength fine-grained soil |
| Mixed / Silty Clay | qa ≈ 7N | Average for mixed behavior |
| Weathered / Soft Rock | qa ≈ 600 + 20N | Empirical for weak rock |
| Hard Rock | qa ≈ 1600 + 30N | High strength rock foundations |
5. Allowable vs Ultimate Bearing Capacity
The calculator computes:
- Ultimate Bearing Capacity (qult) — theoretical maximum pressure before shear failure
- Allowable Bearing Capacity (qa) — qult divided by the selected Factor of Safety (typically 2.5–3.0)
6. Important Assumptions and Limitations
- The method is **empirical** and provides preliminary estimates only.
- Drilling parameters are influenced by rig type, bit condition, flushing, operator technique, and borehole stability.
- SPT N-equivalent is approximate; local calibration is essential.
- No direct consideration of groundwater table, foundation shape, depth, or eccentricity.
- Does not replace detailed borehole logging, laboratory testing, or plate load tests.
- For final design, always verify with conventional geotechnical investigation and load testing.
This calculator is intended as a supplementary tool for experienced geotechnical professionals. It should never be used as the sole basis for foundation design. Final recommendations must be based on comprehensive site investigation, including boreholes, SPT/CPT, laboratory tests, and engineering judgment.
7. Practical Applications
This rig-based approach is particularly valuable for:
- Real-time strata identification during piling or drilling works
- Preliminary foundation sizing on variable sites
- Quality control during deep foundation installation
- Optimizing borehole locations and depths
Developed as an educational and decision-support tool • Always apply sound engineering judgment and site-specific validation.
0 Comments
If you have any doubts, suggestions , corrections etc. let me know